In 2024 we have seen a series of unsettling developments in the cybersecurity landscape, where vulnerabilities once hidden deep within critical systems have been actively exploited. Chief among these exploits is the ominously named 0-day, signifying a newly discovered vulnerability that developers have had no time to respond to before attacks commence. This term has come to define a generation of cyber threats that bypass traditional defenses with startling ease as various hardware platforms fall victim to these relentless incursions.
Samsung’s Exynos processors were among the first to face the assault. A 0-day exploit (CVE-2024-44068) targeted their firmware, specifically in models like the Exynos 9820 and W920, where a subtle “use-after-free” bug allowed attackers to elevate their privileges. Through this flaw, malicious actors could execute arbitrary code on Android devices, putting countless users at risk. Although Samsung rushed to patch the issue, the vulnerability highlighted the precarious state of modern mobile security.
Google’s Pixel devices soon followed in a similar fate. Another 0-day exploit emerged, this time striking at the core of the Pixel’s operating system, enabling attackers to take control of the device by escalating privileges without the user’s knowledge. Google’s response was swift, issuing a security update in June 2024, but the existence of such a flaw in one of the world’s most secure phones was a chilling reminder of the fallibility of even the most advanced technology.
The specter of 0-day did not limit itself to mobile devices. Microsoft products, including Windows, SharePoint, and Edge, fell prey to multiple zero-day vulnerabilities, with CVE-2024-38094 leading the charge in executing remote code across systems. This onslaught was followed by revelations of security holes within critical network infrastructures, most notably Palo Alto Networks’ PAN-OS and Cisco’s NX-OS devices. The 0-day exploit (CVE-2024-3400) affecting PAN-OS leveraged a command injection flaw, while Cisco’s suffered from another 0-day (CVE-2024-20399), granting administrative attackers the ability to run commands with root privileges, a breach that left network administrators scrambling for solutions.
Fortinet’s FortiOS was next in line. Another 0-day (CVE-2024-21762), identified as an out-of-bounds write vulnerability, allowed remote unauthenticated attackers to exploit SSL VPN components. Over 150,000 devices worldwide, spanning the U.S., Japan, India, and Brazil, were exposed to the risk of total system compromise. Fortinet’s patches arrived in time, but the sheer scale of potential exposure showcased the increasing reliance on patchwork solutions to address deep-seated flaws in critical infrastructure.
The march of 0-day continued, making its presence felt in the world of open-source firewalls, particularly pfSense. The situation was dire here: multiple flaws, including CVE-2023-42326, exposed the firewall to remote code execution attacks. While Netgate worked to release patches for its pfSense Plus and CE software, the vulnerability was a stark reminder of the dangers inherent in open-source systems, where security is often as much a communal responsibility as the vendor’s.
As the dust settles on these developments, one thing is abundantly clear: 0-day exploits have evolved from obscure technical concerns into the primary battlefield of the digital age. The vulnerabilities laid bare in 2024 serve as both a warning and a challenge, reminding us that in the world of cybersecurity, no fortress is unbreakable, and no system is ever truly safe.
Story By
Skeeter Wesinger
October 23, 2024