, , ,

In a classic phishing move

In a classic phishing move: spoofing a legit security company like VadeSecure to make the email look trustworthy. Irony at its finest—phishers pretending to be the anti-phishing experts.

Here’s what’s likely going on:

  • vadesecure.com is being spoofed—the return address is faked to show their domain, but the email didn’t actually come from Vade’s servers.

  • Or the phishers are using a lookalike domain (e.g., vadesecure-support.com or vadesecure-mail.com) to trick people not paying close attention.

If you still have the email:

  • You can check the email headers to see the real “from” server (look for Return-Path and Received lines).

  • If the SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks fail in the headers, that’s confirmation it’s spoofed.

  • You can also report it to VadeSecure directly at: abuse@vadesecure.com

By Skeeter Wesinger

March 26, 2025

/0 Comments/by
, , , , ,

DeepSeek’s Mind-Blowing AI Solution Caught in a Cover-Up?

DeepSeek, a rising CCP AI company, was under siege. The company’s official statement, issued in careful, bureaucratic phrasing, spoke of an orchestrated “distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack” aimed at crippling its systems. A grave and urgent matter, to be sure. Yet, for those who had followed the firm’s meteoric rise, there was reason for skepticism

DeepSeek had, until this moment, presented itself as a leader in artificial intelligence, one of the few entities capable of standing alongside Western firms in the increasingly cutthroat race for dominance in machine learning. It was a firm backed, either openly or in whispered speculation, by the unseen hand of the Chinese state. The company’s servers, housed in mainland China, were reportedly fueled by NVIDIA H800 GPUs, their interconnections optimized through NVLink and InfiniBand. A formidable setup, at least on paper

But then came the curious measures. Whole swaths of IP addresses, particularly from the United States, were unceremoniously blocked. The platform’s registration doors were slammed shut. And in the vague, elliptical style of official Chinese pronouncements, the public was assured that these were emergency steps to preserve service stability. What the company did not say—what they could not say—was that these actions bore all the hallmarks of a hasty retreat, rather than a tactical defense

For a true DDoS attack—one launched by sophisticated adversaries—there were measures to mitigate it. Content delivery networks. Traffic filtering. Rate-limiting techniques refined over decades by those who had fought in the trenches of cybersecurity. Yet DeepSeek’s response was not one of resilience, but of restriction. They were not filtering the bad actors; they were sealing themselves off from the world

A theory began to take shape among industry watchers. If DeepSeek had overestimated its own technological prowess, if its infrastructure was ill-prepared for rapid growth, the sudden influx of new users might have looked, to their own internal systems, like an attack. And if the company was not merely a commercial enterprise but an entity with deeper ties—perhaps to sectors of the Chinese government—it would not do to admit such failings publicly. To confess that their AI could not scale, that their systems could not bear the weight of global interest, would be an unpardonable humiliation.

The consequences of such a revelation would be severe. The markets had already felt the tremors of cyberattacks; the global economy had bled $1.5 trillion due to disruptions of this nature. If DeepSeek, a firm hailed as the vanguard of China’s AI ambitions, was faltering under its own weight, the financial and political repercussions would extend far beyond the walls of its server farms. The illusion of invulnerability had to be maintained

Thus, the narrative of a “DDoS attack” was not merely convenient—it was necessary. It allowed DeepSeek to take drastic action while obscuring the truth. Blocking foreign IPs? A countermeasure against cyber threats. Suspending new users? A precaution against infiltration. A firm whose technological backbone was more fragile than its reputation suggested had suddenly found an excuse to withdraw from scrutiny under the guise of self-defense

It is in such moments that history leaves its telltale fingerprints. The annals of technological development are filled with entities that stumbled not due to sabotage, but due to their own shortcomings, concealed under layers of propaganda and misdirection. One wonders if, years from now, when the documents are unsealed and the real story emerges, historians will look back at DeepSeek’s so-called DDoS crisis not as an act of foreign aggression—but as a moment of revelation, when the cracks in the edifice became too great to hide

Also, the DeepSeek app has been removed from both Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store in Italy. This action occurred after Italy’s data protection authority, known as the Garante, requested information from DeepSeek regarding its handling of personal data. Users attempting to access the app in Italy received messages indicating that it was “currently not available in the country or area you are in” on Apple’s App Store and that the download “was not supported” on Google’s platform. As reported by REUTERS.CO

Regarding Ireland, the Irish Data Protection Commission has also reached out to DeepSeek, seeking details about how it processes data related to Irish users. However, as of now, there is no confirmation that the app has been removed from app stores in Ireland. As reported by THEGUARDIAN.COM

Currently there is no publicly available information indicating that DeepSeek has specifically blocked access from Apple, Google, or individual reporters’ servers. It’s possible that access issues could be related to the broader measures DeepSeek has implemented in response to recent events, but without specific details, it’s difficult to determine the exact cause.

For now, the truth remains elusive, hidden behind digital firewalls and the careful hand of censorship. But as in all such cases, history is patient. It waits for those who will dig deeper, who will look beyond the official statements and ask: Was it an attack? Or was it something else entirely?

Story By Skeeter Wesinger

January 30, 2025

 

/2 Comments/by
, , ,

Breaking boundaries When the dead come alive

The recent emergence of an animated representation of John McAfee as a Web3 AI agent is a notable example of how artificial intelligence and blockchain technologies are converging to create digital personas. This development involves creating a digital entity that emulates McAfee’s persona, utilizing AI to interact within decentralized platforms.
In the context of Web3, AI agents are autonomous programs designed to perform specific tasks within blockchain ecosystems. They can facilitate transactions, manage data, and even engage with users in a human-like manner. The integration of AI agents into Web3 platforms has been gaining momentum, with projections estimating over 1 million AI agents operating within blockchain networks by 2025.

John McAfee
Creating an AI agent modeled after John McAfee could serve various purposes, such as promoting cybersecurity awareness, providing insights based on McAfee’s philosophies, or even as a form of digital memorialization. However, the involvement of hackers in this process raises concerns about authenticity, consent, and potential misuse.
The animation aspect refers to using AI to generate dynamic, lifelike representations of individuals. Advancements in AI have made it possible to create highly realistic animations that can mimic a person’s voice, facial expressions, and mannerisms. While this technology has legitimate applications, it also poses risks, such as creating deepfakes—fabricated media that can be used to deceive or manipulate.
In summary, the animated portrayal of John McAfee as a Web3 AI agent exemplifies the intersection of AI and blockchain technologies in creating digital personas. While this showcases technological innovation, it also underscores the importance of ethical considerations and the need for safeguards against potential misuse.
As John McAfee was reported deceased on June 23, 2021, while being held in a Spanish prison. Authorities stated that his death was by suicide, occurring shortly after a court approved his extradition to the United States on tax evasion charges. Despite this, his death has been surrounded by considerable speculation and controversy, fueled by McAfee’s outspoken nature and previous statements suggesting he would not take his own life under such circumstances.
The emergence of a “Web3 AI agent” bearing his likeness is likely an effort by developers or individuals to capitalize on McAfee’s notoriety and reputation as a cybersecurity pioneer. By leveraging blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies, this project has recreated a digital persona that reflects his character, albeit in a purely synthetic and algorithm-driven form. While this may serve as a form of homage or a conceptual experiment in Web3 development, ethical concerns regarding consent and authenticity are significant, mainly since McAfee is no longer alive to authorize or refute the use of his likeness.
While John McAfee is indeed deceased, his name and persona resonate within the tech and cybersecurity communities, making them a focal point for projects and narratives that intersect with his legacy. This raises broader questions about digital rights, posthumous representations, and the ethical boundaries of technology. Stay tuned.

Skeeter Wesinger
January 24, 2025

/1 Comment/by
, ,

Chinese-Made Air Fryers Raise Alarms Over User Data Collection

Recent investigations have raised concerns about certain Chinese-made smart devices, including air fryers, collecting excessive user data without clear justification. A report by the UK consumer group Which? found that smart air fryers from brands like Xiaomi and Aigostar request permissions to access users’ precise locations and record audio via their associated smartphone apps. Additionally, these devices may transmit personal data to servers in China and connect to advertising trackers from platforms such as Facebook and TikTok’s ad network, Pangle.

These findings suggest that the data collected could be shared with third parties for marketing purposes, often without sufficient transparency or user consent. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) plans to introduce new guidelines in spring 2025 to enhance data transparency and protection for consumers.

In response to these concerns, Xiaomi stated that it adheres to all UK data protection laws and does not sell personal information to third parties. The company also mentioned that certain app permissions, such as audio recording, are not applicable to their smart air fryer, which does not operate through voice commands.

These revelations highlight the importance of consumers being vigilant about the data permissions they grant to smart devices and the potential privacy implications associated with their use. While companies like Huawei and others are facing scrutiny over data privacy concerns, they have consistently defended their practices by emphasizing their adherence to local and international regulations. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): In the EU, Huawei highlights compliance with GDPR standards, which are among the most stringent globally. Huawei asserts adherence to national laws and specific security frameworks.

By Skeeter Wesinger

December 16, 2024

/by
, , , ,

How Taylor Swift Concerts Turn Fans into Digital Gold

When you picture a Taylor Swift concert, the images that come to mind are likely of electrifying performances, crowds belting out every lyric, and phones lighting up arenas like a starry sky. But the story doesn’t end with the music. Every fan, knowingly or not, leaves behind a digital trail—a trove of metadata that transforms a single concert into a powerful tool for marketers, event organizers, and brands.

The journey to a Taylor Swift concert often begins long before the show. GPS data from smartphones unveils travel patterns with surprising precision. Organizers can discern how many fans are locals and how many travel from afar, identifying regional fan hubs and their popularity. Travel patterns from hotel bookings, public transit usage, and ride-sharing apps provide further insights into attendee logistics. These patterns inform everything from tour schedules to marketing strategies, allowing organizers to better cater to their audience.

Demographics go beyond what’s captured during ticket purchases. Social media activity, linked accounts, and payment methods contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the audience. AI tools analyzing concert photos or posts refine demographic estimates such as age and gender distribution. The choice of ticket tiers, from standard admission to VIP experiences, offers insight into income brackets, while additional data on spending for hotels, dining, and transportation completes the economic snapshot. These details provide invaluable context for planning future events and crafting targeted campaigns.

The fan frenzy on social media is more than just entertainment. It’s data. Hashtags like #ErasTour and #TaylorSwift serve as digital breadcrumbs, revealing shared interests and passions like fashion, activism, and pop culture. Taylor-inspired outfits showcased in concert photos often influence larger industry trends. Platforms like Spotify analyze shifts in listening behavior before and after the concert, providing insights into fan engagement and preferences.

The Social Factor asking did attendees come solo, with friends, or as part of a family group? Ticket purchase data and metadata from social media interactions provide answers. Additional data points, like selfies and group tags, flesh out the narrative. Heatmaps of venue movement identify popular zones like concession stands or merch booths. These dynamics reveal how fans interact with each other and their environment, creating opportunities for better crowd management and targeted merchandise placement.

Tracking merchandise sales tells its own story. Hot-selling items and their price points reveal fan preferences and inform future merchandise strategies. AI tools analyzing smiles in photos, cheers during key moments, and online reviews provide a sense of the audience’s emotional connection to the performance.

For sponsors, the metadata is a goldmine of insights. Fans tagging sponsor booths, using branded hashtags, or interacting with giveaways provide measurable metrics for engagement. Real-time mentions on social media reveal which partnerships resonate most with the audience.

A Taylor Swift concert is not just a performance—it’s a live data lab. Where every transaction, hashtag, and movement contributes to a greater narrative, informing decisions about future tours, sponsorships, and merchandise. Yet, this treasure trove of data raises important questions about privacy and consent. As technology advances, so does the need for ethical data collection and usage practices. Also, one must ask who is looking at this data.

Ultimately, a Taylor Swift concert is more than music—it’s a symphony of information. The fans may carry memories of a lifetime, but their digital footprints leave a legacy that continues to shape the entertainment world long after the last note has faded.

By Skeeter Wesinger

December 9, 2024

 

Find this article on LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-taylor-swift-concerts-turn-fans-digital-gold-skeeter-wesinger-y2qte

/by
, , , , ,

Salt Typhoon: The Cyberattack That Threatens Global Stability

In response, U.S. officials have urged the public to switch to encrypted messaging services such as Signal and WhatsApp. These platforms offer the only reliable defense against unauthorized access to private communications. Meanwhile, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are working alongside affected companies to contain the breach, fortify networks, and prevent future incursions. Yet, this incident raises a troubling question: Are we witnessing the dawn of a new era in cyber conflict, where the lines between espionage and outright warfare blur beyond recognition?

The Salt Typhoon attack is more than a wake-up call—it’s a stark reminder that robust cybersecurity measures are no longer optional. The consequences of this breach extend far beyond the immediate damage, rippling through geopolitics and economics in ways that could reshape global power dynamics.

One might wonder, “What could the PRC achieve with fragments of seemingly innocuous data?” The answer lies in artificial intelligence. With its vast technological resources, China could use AI to transform this scattered information into a strategic treasure trove—a detailed map of U.S. telecommunications infrastructure, user behavior, and exploitable vulnerabilities.

AI could analyze metadata from call records to uncover social networks, frequent contacts, and key communication hubs. Even unencrypted text messages, often dismissed as trivial, could reveal personal and professional insights. Metadata, enriched with location stamps, offers the ability to track movements and map behavioral patterns over time.

By merging this data with publicly available information—social media profiles, public records, and more—AI could create enriched profiles, cross-referencing datasets to identify trends, anomalies, and relationships. Entire organizational structures could be unearthed, revealing critical roles and influential figures in government and industry.

AI’s capabilities go further. Sentiment analysis could gauge public opinion and detect dissatisfaction with remarkable precision. Machine learning models could anticipate vulnerabilities and identify high-value targets, while graph-based algorithms could map communication networks, pinpointing leaders and insiders for potential exploitation.

The implications are both vast and chilling. Armed with such insights, the PRC could target individuals in sensitive positions, exploiting personal vulnerabilities for recruitment or coercion. It could chart the layout of critical infrastructure, identifying nodes for future sabotage. Even regulatory agencies and subcontractors could be analyzed, creating leverage points for broader influence.

This is the terrifying reality of Salt Typhoon: a cyberattack that strikes not just at data but at the very trust and integrity of a nation’s systems. It is a silent assault on the confidence in infrastructure, security, and the resilience of a connected society. Such a breach should alarm lawmakers and citizens alike, as the true implications of an attack of this magnitude are difficult to grasp.

The PRC, with its calculated precision, has demonstrated how advanced AI and exhaustive data analysis can be weaponized to gain an edge in cyber and information warfare. What appear today as isolated breaches could coalesce into a strategic advantage of staggering proportions. The stakes are clear: the potential to reshape the global balance of power, not through military might, but through the quiet, pervasive influence of digital dominance.

By Skeeter Wesinger

December 5, 2024

 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/salt-typhoon-cyberattack-threatens-global-stability-skeeter-wesinger-iwoye

/by
,

Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia) Labels Salt Typhoon ‘Unprecedented Telecom Breach in U.S. History’

In September, I described Salt Typhoon as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in American infrastructure—vulnerabilities persistently exploited by foreign adversaries in a calculated, multi-pronged campaign. Today, those words resonate more sharply than ever. This latest cyber offensive, attributed to Chinese-backed hackers, underscores the growing sophistication of advanced persistent threat (APT) groups and their relentless targeting of critical U.S. systems.

These incursions are not isolated. Operations like Volt Typhoon and Salt Typhoon reveal a chilling consistency in their objectives: exploiting the weakest links in America’s digital defenses. Each campaign, designed with precision, probes the structural fault lines of U.S. cybersecurity, highlighting the expanding ambitions of foreign actors determined to compromise national security.

The Salt Typhoon Incident
The Salt Typhoon breach raises alarms for its focus on Internet Service Providers (ISPs)—the backbone of American connectivity. Investigations have suggested that critical infrastructure, including Cisco Systems routers, may have been exploited, though Cisco has vigorously denied any compromise of their equipment. Regardless, the implications are grave. The potential for adversaries to intercept data, disrupt services, and surveil at will poses a direct and unprecedented threat to national security.

This breach highlights the dangerous potential of Living off the Land (LotL) techniques, which Salt Typhoon has used to devastating effect. By exploiting legitimate system tools like Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), PowerShell, and network utilities, the hackers minimized their digital footprint. This strategy evades traditional defenses while allowing attackers to persist unnoticed within compromised systems.

Why LotL Techniques Matter
Evasion: LotL leverages tools already present in systems, bypassing security measures that whitelist these utilities.
Persistence: Hackers can maintain long-term access without deploying custom binaries, making detection even more challenging.
Stealth: By mimicking normal system operations, LotL activities are easily overlooked during routine monitoring.
LotL exemplifies the calculated approach of Salt Typhoon. By integrating seamlessly into critical infrastructure operations, the group has demonstrated its ability to infiltrate and persist undetected, particularly in U.S. telecommunications networks.

A Growing Threat
Despite its magnitude, the public often remains unaware of the depth and frequency of these intrusions. The U.S., as Sen. Warner aptly stated, is perpetually on the defensive—patching vulnerabilities while adversaries press forward, undeterred. This dynamic is not new, but the scale and stakes of Salt Typhoon elevate it to a historical inflection point in cyber warfare.

Beijing’s vast cyber apparatus, insidious and relentless, continues to demonstrate its capability to penetrate America’s most vital systems without firing a single shot. As history has often shown, the full impact of such breaches may only become clear long after the damage has been done.

A Call to Action
The lessons of Salt Typhoon are clear: U.S. cybersecurity must evolve rapidly to address the persistent and growing threat posed by state-sponsored cyber operations. Enhancing detection, improving resilience, and investing in cutting-edge security measures will be critical to defending against these sophisticated and stealthy campaigns.

Let Salt Typhoon serve as both a warning and a rallying cry. Inaction is no longer an option when the stakes are this high.

By Skeeter Wesinger

November 22, 2024

 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sen-mark-r-warner-d-virginia-labels-salt-typhoon-telecom-wesinger-z1twc

 

 

/by
, , , ,

Nvidia Beats the Street Record Growth Fueled by Hopper and Blackwell Innovations

Nvidia, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, has emerged as a beacon of technological innovation, much as the industrial giants of a bygone era reshaped their worlds. Its latest creations—the Hopper GPU and Blackwell systems—are not merely advancements in computing; they are the tools of a new industrial revolution, their influence stretching across industries and into the lives of millions. As measured by its astonishing financial results, the company’s trajectory reflects the unparalleled demand for these tools.

The latest quarter’s revenue, a staggering $35.08 billion, represents a 94% leap from the $18.12 billion of a year prior—a figure that would have seemed fantastical not long ago. Its net income soared to $19.31 billion, more than double last year’s third-quarter figure of $9.24 billion. Even after accounting for adjustments, earnings reached 81 cents per share, outpacing Wall Street’s expectations of 75 cents per share on projected revenues of $33.17 billion, according to FactSet.

This is no mere coincidence of market forces or transient trends. Nvidia’s success is rooted in the astonishing versatility of its Hopper GPU and Blackwell systems. Their applications span a broad spectrum—from artificial intelligence to cybersecurity—each deployment, which is a testament to their transformative power. These are not simply tools but harbingers of a future where the limits of what machines can do are redrawn with each passing quarter.

The Hopper and Blackwell systems are not isolated achievements; they are central to Nvidia’s rise as a leader in innovation, its vision ever fixed on the horizon. The technology reshapes industries as varied as medicine, entertainment, finance, and autonomous systems, weaving a thread of progress through all it touches. Like the significant advancements of earlier eras, these creations do not merely answer existing questions; they pose new ones, unlocking doors to realms previously unimagined.

Thus, Nvidia’s record-breaking quarter is a financial milestone and a marker of its place in history. As it shapes the future of computing, the company’s influence extends far beyond the confines of Silicon Valley. It is, in a sense, a reflection of our age—a testament to human ingenuity and the ceaseless drive to innovate, explore, and create.

By Skeeter Wesinger

November 20, 2024

/by
, , , ,

The New Frontline in Security Technology: Large Language Models in the Battle for Software Security

In the age of relentless digital transformation, software security remains both a bulwark and a vulnerability. The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as tools to fortify this critical frontier marks a turning point, one that evokes the blend of promise and peril characteristic of technological revolutions. Like radar in the skies of the Second World War, these LLMs have the potential to detect threats unseen by the human eye, provided they are used judiciously and in concert with other defenses.

The power of LLMs lies in their unparalleled ability to analyze vast swaths of source code with a speed and thoroughness that human developers cannot match. From detecting the cracks in the foundation—buffer overflows, injection vulnerabilities, hardcoded credentials, and improper input validation—to recognizing subtle, non-obvious threats that arise from the interplay of complex systems, these models operate with an unrelenting vigilance. What might take a team of skilled engineers days or weeks to unearth, an LLM can flag in minutes, scouring line after line with mechanical precision.

This capability is most potent during the prerelease phase of development when the entire source code is laid bare. It is here, before a product sees the light of day, that LLMs can expose vulnerabilities lurking in the shadows, vulnerabilities that, if left unchecked, could later metastasize into full-blown breaches. The cost of such breaches is not merely financial but reputational, eroding the trust that underpins all digital enterprises.

Consider the subtle artistry of an LLM detecting insecure data handling in a function, not because the code itself appears flawed but because of the way it interacts with calls elsewhere in the codebase. This is no brute-force analysis; it is an exercise in pattern recognition, a demonstration of how machines are learning to see the forest as well as the trees.

Yet, as with radar, the promise of LLMs must be tempered by realism. They are not a standalone defense, nor do they obviate the need for more traditional measures. They complement fuzzing, which tests software by bombarding it with random inputs and identifying areas where such testing might be most fruitful. They serve as a first line of defense, flagging issues for human reviewers who can then apply their judgment and experience to resolve them.

Moreover, LLMs can act as vigilant assistants during development itself, offering real-time suggestions for secure coding practices. In doing so, they become not merely tools of analysis but instruments of prevention, guiding developers away from insecure practices before they become embedded in the code.

What sets LLMs apart is their scalability. Unlike manual reviews, which are labor-intensive and constrained by human resources, LLMs can analyze sprawling codebases or even multiple projects simultaneously. This scalability is nothing short of transformative for organizations tasked with securing complex software ecosystems.

Used in concert with fuzzing, manual reviews, and other security protocols, LLMs represent the new frontline in software security. They bring automation and scale to an arena that has long been constrained by the limitations of time and manpower. Their ability to access and analyze full source code during development ensures that the vulnerabilities they uncover are not only flagged but actionable.

The lessons of history remind us that no single technology, no matter how transformative, can operate in isolation. LLMs are tools of immense potential, but it is the interplay of man and machine, of automation and expertise, that will ultimately determine their success. In this emerging battle for the sanctity of our digital infrastructures, LLMs are an ally of immense promise, provided we deploy them wisely and with an understanding of their limitations.

By Skeeter Wesinger

November 18, 2024

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-frontline-security-technology-skeeter-wesinger-olzbe

/by
, , ,

A New Front in Cybersecurity Exposed

In a move that has set the cybersecurity world on alert, Palo Alto Networks has sounded the alarm on a significant security flaw in their Expedition tool, a platform designed to streamline the migration of firewall configurations to their proprietary PAN-OS. This vulnerability, codified as CVE-2024-5910, underscores the critical importance of authentication protocols in safeguarding digital boundaries. The flaw itself—a missing authentication mechanism—permits attackers with mere network access the alarming ability to reset administrator credentials, effectively opening the gate to unauthorized access and potentially compromising configuration secrets, credentials, and sensitive data that lie at the heart of an organization’s digital defenses.

The gravity of this flaw is underscored by the immediate attention of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which has not only added the vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog but also issued a direct mandate: all federal agencies must address this vulnerability by November 28, 2024. The urgency of this deadline signifies more than just bureaucratic efficiency; it speaks to the alarming nature of a vulnerability that CISA reports is being exploited in the wild, thus shifting this issue from a theoretical risk to an active threat.

Palo Alto Networks has responded with characteristic clarity, outlining a series of robust security measures to mitigate this vulnerability. They emphasize restricting the PAN-OS management interface to trusted internal IP addresses, advising against exposure to the open internet. In addition, they recommend isolating the management interface within a dedicated VLAN, further securing communications through SSH and HTTPS. These measures, while straightforward, demand a high level of attention to detail in implementation—an effort that could very well mean the difference between a fortified system and a compromised one.

Meanwhile, in a strategic pivot, Palo Alto Networks has announced that the core functionalities of Expedition will soon be integrated into new offerings, marking the end of Expedition support as of January 2025. The shift signals a broader evolution within the company’s ecosystem, perhaps heralding more advanced, integrated solutions that can preemptively address vulnerabilities before they surface.

The directive to apply patches and adhere to the recommended security configurations is not just sound advice; it is, as security expert Wesinger noted, a necessary defensive measure in a rapidly shifting landscape where the stability of one’s systems rests on the relentless vigilance of their custodians. The events unfolding around CVE-2024-5910 are a reminder that in cybersecurity, as in any theater of conflict, complacency remains the greatest vulnerability.

By Skeeter Wesinger

November 14, 2024

 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-front-cybersecurity-exposed-skeeter-wesinger-rjypf

/by