The Fall of Saigon

Fifty Years Gone: Saigon and the End of America’s Long War
By Skeeter Wesinger
May 4, 2025

This week marks fifty years since the fall of Saigon—though in truth, the city did not fall. It was abandoned. On April 30, 1975, a North Vietnamese tank breached the iron gates of the Presidential Palace, and the war America had fought, debated, televised, and tried to forget came to a shattering close. It was a scene not of triumph, nor of reconciliation, but of exhaustion—ours, theirs, everyone’s.

For those of us who remember it, the day belongs on a short list of American cataclysms. It is spoken of in the same breath as the day Kennedy was shot, and the morning the Challenger fell from the sky—moments when the national spirit broke mid-sentence, and even those far from the epicenter felt the tremor in their bones.

We watched Saigon not fall but flee, beneath the thudding blades of overloaded helicopters evacuating the last Americans and desperate allies from rooftops. On the ground, South Vietnamese citizens begged for an escape that would never come. Inside our borders, we watched it unfold on television—grim, chaotic, and final. No one cheered. There was no ticker tape. No “Mission Accomplished.” No applause from the Senate floor. There was only silence and a gnawing sense that something had gone irreparably wrong.

And then there was the deck of the USS Hancock, where desperate choices were made. To make room for a South Vietnamese pilot flying a tiny Cessna Bird Dog—his wife and children crammed aboard—American crews pushed helicopters overboard into the sea. It was an act of mercy and madness that defined the war’s end in miniature: sacrifice, chaos, and a brief moment of grace.

The war had ended, but in a way that left every side wounded. The Vietnamese people were forced into the arms of a harsh new regime, or onto the decks of overcrowded boats. Here at home, American soldiers—many barely old enough to vote—returned not as conquering heroes, but as a generation to be pitied, or worse, ignored. Even those who had never served, who had only sat cross-legged on shag carpet while Cronkite or Chancellor intoned solemn truths from behind a desk, were shaped by it. For them, the war was not a memory but a nightly ritual of body counts, jungle footage, and questions that no one in Washington could answer.

In the years that followed, we turned inward. Distrust in government deepened. The myth of American infallibility lay smoldering alongside the burned files on the embassy floor. We began to ask harder questions—about power, about intervention, about what patriotism demanded. And many, too many, stopped asking at all.

It would be decades before any measure of healing began. But even today, the scar remains visible to those who know where to look.

Anniversaries like this are not just for commemoration. They are for reckoning. We remember April 30, 1975, not because it ended a war, but because it forced a nation to look in the mirror—and see not the arsenal of democracy, but a republic uncertain of its own shadow.

Fifty years have passed. The names have faded from headlines. But to those of us who lived through it—who watched that tank roll through the palace gate, who still hear the hum of rotor blades in our memory—it is as vivid now as it was then.

History does not forgive forgetfulness. It requires us to remember—and to reflect—not with romanticism but with clarity. We owe that to the dead, to the displaced, and most of all, to the living, who still carry the war with them fifty years later. In case you missed it.

https://open.substack.com/pub/skeetersw/p/the-fall-of-saigon?r=1sp2om&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true