Beyond Euclidean Memory: Quantum Storage Architectures Using 4D Hypercubes, Wormhole-Looped States, and Braided Qubit Paths

By Skeeter Wesinger

Abstract In the evolving landscape of quantum technology, traditional memory systems rooted in Euclidean geometry are hitting their limits. This post explores three radical constructs—4D hypercubes, wormhole-looped memory states, and braided qubit paths—that are redefining how information is stored, accessed, and preserved in quantum systems. Together, these approaches promise ultradense, energy-efficient, and fault-tolerant memory networks by moving beyond conventional spatial constraints.

  1. Introduction Classical memory architecture assumes linear addressability in a 2D or 3D layout—structures that struggle to scale in the face of today’s power, thermal, and quantum coherence constraints. Quantum memory design, on the other hand, opens the door to higher-dimensional and non-local models. This article outlines a new conceptual framework for memory as a dynamic, entangled fabric of computation, rather than a passive container of bits.
  2. The 4D Hypercube in Memory Design The tesseract, or 4D hypercube, expands traditional 3D memory lattices by adding a fourth spatial axis. This architecture allows non-linear adjacencies and exponential addressability.

2.1 Spatial Folding and Compression

  • Logical neighbors can occupy non-contiguous physical space
  • Memory density increases without amplifying thermal output
  • Redundant access paths collapse, reducing latency

2.2 Picobots and MCUs

  • Picobots manage navigation through hyperedges
  • Micro-Control Units (MCUs) translate 4D coordinates into executable memory requests
  1. Wormhole-Looped Memory States Quantum entanglement allows two distant memory nodes to behave as if adjacent, thanks to persistent tunneling paths—or wormhole-like bridges.

3.1 Topological Linking

  • Entangled nodes behave as spatially adjacent
  • Data can propagate with no traversal through intermediate nodes

3.2 Redundancy and Fault Recovery

  • Instant fallback routes minimize data loss during decoherence events
  • Eliminates thermal hotspots and failure zones
  1. Braided Qubit Paths Borrowed from topological quantum computing, braided qubit paths encode information not in particle states, but in the paths particles take.

4.1 Topological Encoding

  • Logical data is stored in the braid pattern
  • Immune to transient local noise and electromagnetic fluctuations

4.2 Persistent Logic Structures

  • Braids can be reconfigured without data corruption
  • Logical gates become pathways, not gates per se
  1. Non-Local 3D Topologies: The Execution Layer Memory in these architectures is not stored in a fixed location—it lives across a distributed, entangled field.

5.1 Flattening Physical Constraints

  • Logical proximity trumps physical distance
  • Reduces energy costs associated with moving data

5.2 Topological Meshes and Networked Tensors

  • MCUs dynamically reconfigure access paths based on context
  • Enables self-healing networks and true parallel data operations
  1. Conclusion Quantum systems built around 4D hypercubes, wormhole-bridged memory states, and braided qubit paths promise not just new efficiencies, but a reimagining of what memory is. These systems are not static repositories—they are active participants in computation itself. In escaping the confines of Euclidean layout, we may unlock memory architectures capable of evolving with the data they hold.

Welcome to memory without location.

Follow Skeeter Wesinger on Substack  For more deep dives into quantum systems, speculative computing, and post-classical architecture. Questions, insights, or counter-theories? Drop a comment below or reach me at skeeter@skeeter.com.

The Last Arizona Ranger: Remembering Harry McPhaul, Lawman, Prospector, Legend

By Skeeter Wesinger

April 15, 2025

In an era when the American West was still being shaped not by policy but by the blunt instruments of grit, lead, and willpower, Henry Harrison “Harry” McPhaul carved his own story into the sun-bleached soil of Arizona.

He arrived in Yuma around 1897, just as the frontier was fading and statehood remained a distant promise. Some men came west to escape; others came to build. Harry, it seems, came to do both.

He quickly found himself in the thick of the territory’s law-and-order struggle—first as a constable, then as a guard at the Yuma Territorial Prison, where discipline was as much about reputation as regulation. He later became a deputy sheriff, and then Yuma’s town marshal, earning the respect—and perhaps the fear—of both outlaws and citizens alike. But of all his titles, one stands alone: Arizona Ranger.

McPhaul is remembered as the only Yuma resident ever to serve in that elite corps. The Rangers, active between 1901 and 1909, were no ordinary deputies. They were handpicked, armed to the teeth, and expected to ride into the most dangerous corners of the territory without backup. It was frontier justice at full gallop—and McPhaul was right in the saddle.

But Harry wasn’t just a man of the law—he was a man of the land. After hanging up his badge, he turned his attention to prospecting, chasing the shimmering illusions of gold and copper in the Gila Mountains. His claim near the Dome Bridge became something of a personal kingdom. The bridge itself, later renamed the McPhaul Bridge, spanned 798 feet and held the title of Arizona’s longest suspension bridge until it was retired in 1968. Today, it stands abandoned, a skeletal echo of a past that refuses to die.

Even in old age, Harry never really slowed down. A Life Magazine photo from November 3, 1947, shows him reclining against a tree, map in hand, eyes fixed not on memory, but on possibility. He was still looking—still hunting—for that next big strike. In that same article, he reportedly boasted of killing five men. Whether in self-defense or as part of his duties, he offered no justification. The number was presented like a resume line—grim, unapologetic, and final.

Harry’s story ended at the Arizona Pioneers’ Home in Prescott, where he spent the last six years of his life. On March 4, 1948, the last breath of a frontier lawman slipped quietly into history. His death certificate recorded him as a retired miner. But that’s not what he was.

He was a husband, once, to Mary Emma “Mae” Despain, whom he married in 1894. Together, they raised five children—Francis, Hortense, Thomas, Gladys, and William. But even family life couldn’t fully tame a man whose soul was more wilderness than hearth.

When he died, his body was returned to Yuma, to the place that had made him and that he in turn had helped shape.

Harry McPhaul didn’t just live in Arizona—he became part of it. In his bridge, in the fading records of Ranger deployments, in the dust of the Gila, his story endures. And like the gold he chased, it glints just beneath the surface—waiting to be discovered by those who still care to dig.

https://skeetersw.substack.com/p/the-last-arizona-ranger

BEIJING, China—In a capital swathed in the gray chill of economic anxiety, the Mandarins of the Chinese Communist Party convened once again, their faces impassive, their words forceful. A new phase of the Cold War has begun.

By Skeeter Wesinger
April 9. 2025

China, though publicly resolved to “fight to the end,” remains exposed—strategically, industrially, and geopolitically—before the full weight of Washington’s economic arsenal. President Donald Trump, in a maneuver reminiscent of early Cold War brinkmanship, has levied a stunning 104 percent tariff on Chinese goods. The effect is already being felt across the Eastern hemisphere and in the darkened boardrooms of Beijing.

However, the game did not begin with the Trump tariffs.

Long before the world turned its attention to tariffs and trade imbalances, Beijing had already moved its pieces. Silently. Systematically. Rare Earth Elements—that vital arsenal of modern industry, the invisible sinews of everything from smartphones to submarines—became the first pawns on China’s grand chessboard.

The Elements of Power
It was a move the West scarcely registered—at first.

China, holding over 90% of global production, began tightening its grip:

Light Rare Earth Elements (LREEs):
Lanthanum, Cerium, Praseodymium, Neodymium,

Promethium (radioactive, rare even in commerce),

Samarium

Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREEs):
Europium, Gadolinium, Terbium, Dysprosium,

Holmium, Erbium, Thulium, Ytterbium, Lutetium

Often grouped as well:
Scandium

Yttrium (considered a heavy REE)

These were not just minerals—they were the ore of empires.

The Timeline of Quiet Aggression
1990s–Early 2000s:
China outproduces the world. The West, disarmed by its own complacency, watches.

2006:
Export quotas are introduced. A whisper of resource conservation is offered. The real reason is leverage.

2009:
The screws tighten. Western firms are pushed to relocate operations to China or be cut off.

2010:
A chilling demonstration of power: after a maritime clash over the Senkaku Islands, China halts rare earth exports to Japan. Global prices skyrocket. Supply chains fracture.

2012:
The United States, Japan, and the EU awaken at last and file a case with the World Trade Organization.

2014:
The WTO rules against Beijing. A brief, Pyrrhic victory for the West.

2015:
China lifts quotas—but tightens internal production controls, maintaining dominance under the guise of environmental stewardship.

Strategic Impact: A Blade with No Sheath
The minerals most threatened:

Neodymium & Praseodymium – the iron sinew of high-strength magnets

Dysprosium & Terbium – the heart of heat-resistant alloys and phosphors

Yttrium & Europium – the bright blood of lasers, screens, and satellite optics

These are not raw materials; they are the nervous system of the modern state.

The New Front
Today, as Trump signals another 50% increase in tariffs, Beijing’s state media calls this confrontation a “strategic opportunity.” It may yet prove to be a grave miscalculation.

China’s Vice Premier Li Qiang has vowed that the nation is “fully confident” in its economic resilience. But confidence is not strength, and rhetoric is not steel. As Henry Gao, an expert in international trade law, notes grimly, “The Chinese economy has been significantly weakened since Trump’s first term.”

Last year, exports to the U.S. were $440 billion—nearly three times what flowed the other way. Much of it machinery, electronics, and consumer goods. Now, a glut looms in domestic markets already saturated.

“Certain products are specifically designed for American or European markets,”
says Tang Yao of Peking University.
“Redirecting them for domestic use will have only a limited effect.”

Even within the pages of the People’s Daily, one reads veiled admissions beneath the nationalist fervor: strategic opportunity is another word for forced pivot.

This is not merely a trade war.
It is the first cold salvo of a new global conflict, a technological standoff not unlike the arms races of the 20th century. This time, the launch codes are in silicon, not silos. The battleground is mineral, digital, and psychological.

And while Washington eyes the Indo-Pacific and Beijing rallies its internal engines, one truth echoes from the last great Cold War:

“He who controls the resources controls the future. He who controls the story controls the war.”

The minerals may be rare, but the struggle for power is not just a meme war on Trump’s tariffs today. There is a larger bolder strategy to this new Cold War.

It is a common misconception to regard the F-16 Block 70/72 as a 50-year-old aircraft simply because the original F-16 design dates back to the 1970s. In reality, the Block 70/72 represents a fundamentally modern fighter jet that only shares the general airframe shape and aerodynamic lineage of its predecessors. Everything else—from its avionics and radar to its flight controls and mission systems—has been redesigned, modernized, or newly developed. The result is an aircraft that meets or exceeds current 4.5-generation fighter standards.

New Build, Modern Airframe

The Block 70/72 variants are not upgrades of old airframes. They are newly manufactured aircraft, built on an advanced production line in Greenville, South Carolina. The new airframes are rated for 12,000 flight hours—50% longer than earlier F-16s—and incorporate structural enhancements that improve durability and survivability in modern combat environments.

21st-Century Avionics and Radar

One of the defining features of the Block 70/72 is the inclusion of the Northrop Grumman AN/APG-83 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. This radar brings the F-16 into the modern era with:

  • Faster target tracking

  • Greater detection range

  • Resistance to jamming and electronic warfare

  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for high-resolution ground mapping

These capabilities are comparable to those found in fifth-generation fighters like the F-35 and ensure the aircraft can operate effectively in contested airspace.

State-of-the-Art Cockpit and Flight Controls

The cockpit of the Block 70/72 has been completely modernized. It features:

  • A glass cockpit with color multifunction displays

  • Digital flight instruments

  • Hands-on throttle and stick (HOTAS) controls

  • Compatibility with advanced helmet-mounted cueing systems

These updates dramatically improve pilot situational awareness, reduce workload, and enable faster reaction times in high-threat environments.

Modern Electronic Warfare and Survivability

The Block 70/72 is equipped with the Viper Shield electronic warfare suite. This system provides:

  • Threat detection

  • Radar warning

  • Electronic countermeasures

  • Decoy and jammer coordination

These defensive measures ensure survivability against modern surface-to-air missile systems and airborne threats.

Fully Compatible with Modern Weapons and Networks

The aircraft supports an extensive range of modern weaponry and is fully interoperable with NATO and allied forces. It includes:

  • Compatibility with precision-guided munitions (JDAM, SDB, etc.)

  • Air-to-air missiles like AIM-9X and AIM-120D

  • Advanced datalink and secure communications (including Link 16)

Conclusion

While the F-16’s design heritage traces back to the 1970s, the Block 70/72 is not a 50-year-old aircraft in any meaningful sense. It is a new-production, modern fighter jet incorporating the latest in radar, avionics, weapons, and survivability systems. Its combination of combat effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and global interoperability makes it a viable platform for 21st-century air forces.

By Skeeter Wesinger

April 4, 2025

In recent remarks made by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun, who criticized the United States for approving a proposed sale to the Philippines of 16 F-16C Block 70/72 fighter aircraft, four F-16D models, Sidewinder air-to-air missiles, radar systems, spare parts, and associated training support.

Guo’s pointed questions—“Who exactly is fueling the flames? Who exactly is instigating military confrontation? Who exactly is turning Asia into a ‘powder keg?’”—are emblematic of Beijing’s rhetorical strategy. These lines are crafted not merely for domestic consumption, but also to influence ASEAN neighbors and cast the U.S. as the aggressor, destabilizing the region. It is classic deflection: presenting China as the stabilizing force while accusing the United States of militarization.

In reality, the proposed sale reflects a growing demand from regional partners for credible deterrence in the face of China’s escalating assertiveness in the South China Sea. The inclusion of modern Block 70/72 F-16s, advanced radar, and Sidewinder missiles is not symbolic—it is strategic. These systems enable the Philippines to better monitor, patrol, and defend its exclusive economic zone and sovereign airspace. More importantly, the inclusion of training support suggests a deepening partnership and interoperability with U.S. forces, indicating that this is not a simple arms transaction but part of a long-term commitment.

China’s objections, particularly the phrase “regional countries are not blind,” are a not-so-subtle warning to its neighbors. But these nations are not blind. They see repeated Chinese incursions, coercive maritime tactics, and an ever-growing presence in disputed waters. In this context, the U.S. response is not only justified—it is measured.

This is Cold War 2.0 in all but name: a contest of influence, where China uses information operations and economic levers, while the United States reinforces alliances and deterrence postures. As history reminds us, arming the perimeter is not an act of aggression—it is an act of preparation.

By Skeeter Wesinger

April 3, 2025

 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cold-war-20-all-name-skeeter-wesinger-z9kee